Νέο Άρθρο
The second half of the 20th century, in the West, seems to be characterized as the reign of the disciplinarian orthodoxy in the humanitarian sciences. The scientific boundaries among the most scholars had been well mapped out – at least by definition. The notions: nation, national, international and on the other hand culture and identity had been treated as if their core meaning and interaction were self-evident. The meaning of power had been theorized as non-problematic as well. In general, all political phenomena were understood to be either derived from liberal individualism or class. The ‘less disciplinary’ scientists, who felt uncomfortable into the stranglehold of their own scientific field, and were compelled by the necessity to express phenomena beyond of the outworn ‘normality’, had been forced to follow a solitary way – often away from their scientific club – deeply respecting an interdisciplinary, scientific approach that was impregnated of a more or less philosophical view.
*Κάντε κλικ εδώ για να διαβάσετε τη συνέχεια και να σχολιάσετε*